Static ICP definitions are already out of date

Fenil Suchak
CEO & Co-Founder @ OpenFunnel
ICP definitions have 2 big problems.
1. They're dictated by filters your data provider gives you.
And as your ICP gets more complex over time - product evolves, market shifts, CS reshapes what "good" looks like - those filters stop holding up.
2. They're missing the dimension of time.
ICP is actually ICP(t).
We've broken Live ICP into 3 parts.
TAQ - Trait, Activities/Active Pain points, Qualifiers
T - Traits Firmographics + a precise description of the company. "AI Code Review SaaS, Enterprise only, 51-200 employees, US."
A - Activity (the active pain point) The "why now."
What are they doing right now that signals a buying window is open.
"Hired someone this morning to revamp their GEO strategy."
"Actively scaling outbound to 2x cold-calling volume."
Q - Qualifier The must-haves for your product to actually land.
">5 SDRs"
"existing built-out RevOps function"
"Use Salesforce"
"Series A in the last 3 months."
Sources for Q can be pretty much anything.
The useful part: TAQ is live.
T and Q move slowly.
A moves every single day.
Companies enter your ICP.
And exit your ICP.
Continuously.
Your data layer needs to support the complexity of each of T, A, and Q.





